Skip to main content

Differing Site Conditions - Whose Risk Is It?

Differing Site Conditions, also known as “changed site conditions” are a vital clause relating to building laws. This clause decides how much liability accrues to the builder or the owner of the land in situations in which soil and other underground conditions, which were different from what was expected, present themselves during a building construction activity.
Differing Site Conditions, or DSC, concerns only the physical conditions such as soil, rock, concrete or other physical conditions and excludes the intangible factors such as costs, labor, expertise and such others.
It is very important for the parties concerned to be clear about this law, because the law prescribes who bears the costs of such discovery, and to what extent it has to be enforced. Lack of knowledge of the contract law could lead to litigation and dispute between them, leading to waste of resources.
A webinar from Traininng.com, a leading provider of professional training for the areas of regulatory compliance, is organizing a webinar on September 26, at which this law, whose enactment dates to more than nine decades, will be explained in detail. James Zack, a senior adviser for Ankura Construction Forum, will be the speaker at this session.
————————————————————————————————
This webinar will explain the history of this law in detail. The speaker will show the need for it to be incorporated into the construction contract. He will examine how this law has changed over time and what its present, modern applications are.
The courts and Boards of Contract Appeals have, over the years, been slowing changing the interpretation of risk allocation under the clause. Successive Court and Board cases have placed a greater risk on the contractor when it comes to differing site conditions.
The expert will take up for discussion a number of Court and Board of Contract Appeal decisions which appear to be slowly eroding the traditional risk allocation commonly accepted under the Differing Site Conditions clause. He will describe what lessons can be learnt from each of these cases. Finally, he will offer a list of practical recommendations for both owners and contractors dealing with the risks of differing site conditions.
5cc877422c8b5.image
Attorneys dealing with site condition claims, owners and owner representatives managing capital improvement projects, contractor executives, project managers, project sponsors and project control personnel, and construction managers and design professionals performing services during construction, the personnel for whose benefit this webinar is being organized, will:
  • Learn about the Differing Site Conditions clause and how it operates
  • Learn what conditions are and are not covered by the Differing Site Conditions clause
  • Understand what must be proven to prevail on a differing site condition claim and what contractual requirements must be complied with in full
  • Become familiar with a number of Court and Board of Contract Appeal decisions which are changing the traditional risk allocation under the Differing Site Conditions clause.
Continue here to read https://t2m.io/p9SzUoN8 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rewards and Recognitions that Get You What You Want to Achieve

The information that follows applies to human resources personnel and management at all levels.Rewards and recognitions are the responsibility of all involved in the management and development of employees. My belief is that one size does not fit all and in order to achieve the desired outcomes, both task responsibilities and individual differences must be taken into account. Why You have to Know There are numerous elements that decide an association's arrangement around remuneration, advantages, prizes and acknowledgments. Maybe the absolute first choice that should be made is one of the essential estimations of the organization. Is it going to be an organization dependent on rank and security or one dependent on legitimacy - or a blend of the two? Government offices and association controlled associations as a rule settle on the real choices of remuneration around arrangement, rank and security. So too do numerous associations in the corporate world.Smaller organizations

Introducing The Simple Way To IDENTITY ISSUES In BANKING

Identity theft is one of the foremost issues for the banking industry. It goes without saying, from an observation of any of the patterns that the fraudsters use for theft, that they are smart. They devise innovative ways to circumvent the system. For example, they don’t use their real name, address or social security numbers when logging in. They could also use stolen or vicarious identities, making investigation a lot harder to carry out. The ways of understanding these complexities will be the topic of a 60-minute webinar from Traininng.com, a leading provider of professional training for all the areas of regulatory compliance. At this valuable session, the expert, Jim George, an independent consultant to banks who focuses on issues of fraud, will be introducing the simple way to identity issues in banking. Please register for this session by visiting ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Identifying th

Electronic Payment Fraud Prevention Best Practices

As online and electronic modes of payment increase in their prevalence, it is a lot easier to transact with money matters than it was a few years ago. One doesn’t need to visit a bank or any other financial institution to make these. One can do so from the comfort of one’s own location. But wait a minute. While these improvements in technology have made our tasks easier, they also come with an inevitable side effect: the potential for fraud. Vulnerability is a byproduct of technology. It is almost inseparable from the benefits that technology brings. Not only individuals around the world, but even organizations are at the receiving end of various smart frauds that dot the electronic payment landscape. Ironical as it may sound, companies don’t have the same levels and layers of protection from electronic payment fraud as individuals. They have less than 24 hours to report the fraud, failing which their chances of recovering their lost money reduce dramatically. So, what is the way